(via americatapparel)
If TMZ focused on any other category but celebrity gossip, I imagine its leader Harvey Levin would be an even bigger emblem of digital brand building than Arianna Huffington. This is one of the most amazing trajectories I have seen in the perennial (usually elusive) pursuit of digital…
(Source: , via futurejournalismproject)
Homeless man gets 15-year sentence for stealing $100 from a bank.
Ex-mortgage CEO gets 3-year sentence for stealing $3 billion from the people.There is no justice for workers in a capitalist system.
Disgusting.
(Source: nirak, via shitdemons)
A Primer on Deploying Google Analytics Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version Send to friend PDF version Posted on June 07, 2011 Google Analytics (GA) can be a powerful tool for tracking the effectiveness of journalists to produce content for the widest audience possible online. At its most basic level, GA is a tool that provides statistics in near real-time on user engagement, the amount of time a visitor spends on a site, how many pages they viewed and where the visitor headed next. There are also advanced techniques that can expand upon these basic questions to expose journalists to detailed patterns of content consumption. There are a handful of approaches to placing Google’s tracking code on a site. For basic tracking, it can be as simple as pasting the Google provided tracking code into the
of the main template on all of the site pages. Depending upon the CMS that your site is built on, there are a number of modules and plug-ins that manage the placement of a basic tracking tag site wide. Fortunately, there are effective plug-ins/modules available for Drupal and Wordpress, that provide additional functionality for detailed tracking of a visitors engagement. For a few examples of deeper integration of GA, see the case studies for The Huffington Post and WNYC. How to properly deploy the Google Analytics tracking script in your template pages If you do not have one already, you’ll need to create a new Google Analytics account. Once you’ve created a new profile for your site, you’ll be presented with a snippet of code that includes a unique Web Property ID specific to your account. The tracking code example below is similar to the one provided by Google. It uses Google’s asynchronous tracking code. An additional feature included in the example, not included in the standard snippet provided by Google, allows a site to track the time it takes for each page to load (which is a useful feature in trouble shooting site performance issues). The recommended placement for this snippet is right above the closing tag in the header of each page. Alternative methods of placement for the snippet can be found in this Asynchronous Tracking Usage Guide. Once the tag is properly placed on each page of the site, you should check the status of the account to verify that data is being received. You can check the status by clicking on “Analytics Settings” in the upper left corner of the Google Analytics page, then click the “Edit” link next to the profile for your site. On the Profile Settings page you’ll see a link to “(Check Status ?)” on the top/right side of the content block. In the event that the profile is not yet receiving data, that link should provide you with further information about how to resolve any issues. Annotations Using Google Analytics can be an effective way of recognizing when efforts to increase engagement and audience size have worked or failed. Google Analytics offers the ability to attach annotations to individual dates to keep track of any major changes you make to the site. This can be an extremely useful way to track the impact of design changes, content partnerships or the publishing of significant articles or posts. Insights The following is a short list of metrics that will be useful to keep track of on a consistent basis when evaluating the effectiveness of your web site: Traffic Sources > Referrals https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/referring_sources Tracking the changes in volume of traffic from different sources and social media efforts. (i.e. Are more or less people discovering our content from Facebook, Twitter, Google News?) Content > Content By Title https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/content_titles What were the most consumed articles during a given time? Visitors > Visitor Loyalty https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/loyalty How devoted is my audience to coming back to the web site and how often? Content > Content Drilldown > Navigation Summary https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/content_detail_navigation How did visitors find a specific page and where did they go when they left that page? Visitors > Maps Overlay https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/maps Where are my visitors geographically? Visitors > Browsers and OS https://www.google.com/analytics/reporting/os_browsers What browsers and or mobile devices are my visitors using to read my content?Zoosk, the online dating site, asked 5,000 singles how they’d feel about receiving unexpected lewd photos.
61% of gals said “creepy”; 71% of dudes said “sexy.”
And there you have the difference between men and women.
After watching this happen again and again, something occurred to me: Why don’t the white men who are asked to engage in this nonsense simply stop doing it? The boycott is a protest with a long history of success. If white, male elites started saying, “I will not participate in your panel, event, or article if it is all about white men,” chances are these panels and articles would quickly dry up—or become more diverse.
“I think it’s ridiculous that this kind of thing goes on in 2011,” says Wired magazine’s Spencer Ackerman, a white guy who’s often written about and asked to be on panels thanks to his vaunted national security reporting. “It’s especially bad when it happens in progressive media, which makes an effort—or at least pays lip service—to promote the idea that media diversity isn’t just an optional thing but a necessity.”
Asked what he thinks about a white-dude panel boycott, Ackerman said it makes sense. “It’s within our power and it’s up to us to say, ‘Why don’t you include my colleague who works on something similar, who has possibly more to say because they’re not listened to as frequently,’” he says. “And if we don’t do it, there’s no incentive for people organizing these things to think more critically about why it is they’re not including these diverse voices.”
(Source: creatrixtiara, via bad-dominicana)